| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Grumpy Owly
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
75
   |
Posted - 2012.01.22 12:33:00 -
[1] - Quote
And yet people in null sec still beleive that these meglomaniac godfather wannabes have their best interests at heart, brainwashing them into beleiving its the "nasty" CCP and high seccers that are to blame for all their woes.
And yet null slaves still beleive all this propoganda. So who really knows better?
Seems your null puppet masters like to shoot themselves in the foot on many levels. Whilst under the dissalusionment they hold all the power. And yet more null seccers maintain alts who activley run in HS and have the need to use HS to survive. How ironic. |
Grumpy Owly
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
75
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 13:55:00 -
[2] - Quote
Andski wrote:saltrock0000 wrote:0.0 focuses on moon mining and sov space - this means the alliance leaders scooping moon goo make billions whilst expecting thier members to fly unsociable hours protecting thier isk income.
The alliance leaders treat thier memebrs like total crap and expect massive turn outs for thier CTA's Those are the alliances that fall apart the second a more powerful entity looks at them crosswise. saltrock0000 wrote:People need to make ISK to fund pvp ships. Now either offer FULL ship replacements or respect people need to RAT to make money to defend your pos's ship replacement programs? what an innovative idea, if only we had thought of that and implemented a comprehensive ISK compensation program for strat ops and a partial compensation program for roaming/solo PvP oh wait, we have, and we're far from the first alliance to do that!
And then look at the 15% tax needed to run that "partial" programme. 
|
Grumpy Owly
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
75
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 13:56:00 -
[3] - Quote
Salicaz wrote:Andski wrote:Salicaz wrote:All the real pvpers are in low sec anyway. camping gates is the pinnacle of elite pvp Who said anything about camping gates, also you're a goon
These are the relatively safe operations by the goons they will re-imburse for ship losses, lol.
You will defend our assests *whip crack* |
Grumpy Owly
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
75
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 14:03:00 -
[4] - Quote
Aruken Marr wrote:
lol you talk some rubbish...
Maybe, but better than the depressing propoganda drivel that the likes of Goons make people suffer. |
Grumpy Owly
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
75
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 14:17:00 -
[5] - Quote
Aruken Marr wrote:Grumpy Owly wrote:Aruken Marr wrote:
lol you talk some rubbish...
Maybe, but better than the depressing propoganda drivel that the likes of Goons make people suffer. Seriously, you have no clue...
Enlighten us all then. Pretty redundant statement otherwise.
Or is all your capability just tourettes like water torture statements with no real content?
I'd ask your Goon puppet masters to deliver some more fish into your diet, it might improve brain activity. Or stop them from using the slave altering brainwashing, seems to adversely effect capabilties. |
Grumpy Owly
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
75
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 14:42:00 -
[6] - Quote
Andski wrote:
fyi we paid out 120b in "partial" reimbursements in december
Well according to the Goonwaffe eve-kill.net board for December you didnt even record that much in lost ISK.
Wonder how much of this "transparent" accounting is really true? 
If its for the whole alliance it equates to then at worst since total losses for the month where 5,661, so on average the worst replacement value would be 21.2 Mil per loss, so ok I suppose if you don't fly anything more in value than than a T1 cruiser under this scenario then your ok. |
Grumpy Owly
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
79
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 15:41:00 -
[7] - Quote
Andski wrote:also you're assuming that EVERY LOSS is reimbursed, we don't reimburse idiots who get jumped while ratting or people who die in empire or in ******* Feythabolis
oh and not everyone files for reimbursement because they're either lazy or so rich that they don't care
Well you have only quoted one number which isn't in any way substantiated or measured against any of the weighting parameters involved, so like your unlearned slave pointed out I was left having to use the numbers I can find under certain conditions to evaluate things as a valid possibility.
As it would be unrealistic for you to be transparent about your numbers wouldn't it? (assuming they're even true).
How ever way you slice it, it appears your only re-imbursing about 38% of recorded losses. I leave individuals to decide how valued that is. As to be honest I'm a bit disadvantaged talking about "your" figures and i don't trust Goons, never will. |
| |
|